Quantcast

Digital inclusion

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Digital inclusion

Charles Matthews
I suppose we're in favour of it. I note that [[digital inclusion]] is a
redlink, for the reason that it was a redirect to [[e-inclusion]]; which
went down under a PROD in October of last year, as  "[[WP:OR|Original
research]] about a [[WP:NEO|non-notable neologism]]". Something of a
disaster, given that "digital inclusion" is a notable neologism.

Anyone prepared to revive? A good cause.

Charles
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[hidden email]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Digital inclusion

Fred Bauder-2
> I suppose we're in favour of it. I note that [[digital inclusion]] is a
> redlink, for the reason that it was a redirect to [[e-inclusion]]; which
> went down under a PROD in October of last year, as  "[[WP:OR|Original
> research]] about a [[WP:NEO|non-notable neologism]]". Something of a
> disaster, given that "digital inclusion" is a notable neologism.
>
> Anyone prepared to revive? A good cause.
>
> Charles

I think we probably have a substantial article on digital divide. Perhaps
both of these could redirect to a section there. Perhaps
Digital_divide#Overcoming_the_digital_divide That could be further
developed including both those terms, if they are in use.

Fred


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[hidden email]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Loading...