Fwd: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP

Sydney Poore
From: Sydney Poore <[hidden email]>
To: Pine W <[hidden email]>
Cc: [hidden email]
Bcc:
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:20:40 -0400
Subject: Re: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP
Hello Pine,
You might want to record it in the IdeaLab to make sure that it considered
for future reference when people are discussing ideas for research.
Sydney


On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM Pine W <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello colleagues,
>
> There is currently a small amount of discussion happening on an ENWP
> arbitration page
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_Discretionary_sanctions>
> regarding what ENWP calls "discretionary sanctions
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions>"
> practices. Does anyone know of research regarding the effects, good and
> bad, of the Arbcom authorization of discretionary sanctions? If not, then I
> suggest that this be a topic of future research, particularly for
> researchers involved with WMF's work on community health.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Pine
> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>


--
Sydney Poore
Trust and Safety Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
Trust and Safety team;
Anti-harassment tools team


--
Sydney Poore
Trust and Safety Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
Trust and Safety team;
Anti-harassment tools team
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP

Pine W
Done:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_on_ENWP_Discretionary_Sanctions

Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )


On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:25 PM Sydney Poore <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: Sydney Poore <[hidden email]>
> To: Pine W <[hidden email]>
> Cc: [hidden email]
> Bcc:
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:20:40 -0400
> Subject: Re: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP
> Hello Pine,
> You might want to record it in the IdeaLab to make sure that it considered
> for future reference when people are discussing ideas for research.
> Sydney
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM Pine W <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hello colleagues,
>>
>> There is currently a small amount of discussion happening on an ENWP
>> arbitration page
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_Discretionary_sanctions>
>> regarding what ENWP calls "discretionary sanctions
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions>"
>> practices. Does anyone know of research regarding the effects, good and
>> bad, of the Arbcom authorization of discretionary sanctions? If not, then I
>> suggest that this be a topic of future research, particularly for
>> researchers involved with WMF's work on community health.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Pine
>> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>>
>
>
> --
> Sydney Poore
> Trust and Safety Specialist
> Wikimedia Foundation
> Trust and Safety team;
> Anti-harassment tools team
>
>
> --
> Sydney Poore
> Trust and Safety Specialist
> Wikimedia Foundation
> Trust and Safety team;
> Anti-harassment tools team
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP

Sydney Poore
Thank you, Pine.
Sydney






On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:30 PM Pine W <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Done:
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_on_ENWP_Discretionary_Sanctions
>
> Pine
> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:25 PM Sydney Poore <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Sydney Poore <[hidden email]>
> > To: Pine W <[hidden email]>
> > Cc: [hidden email]
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:20:40 -0400
> > Subject: Re: Research about discretionary sanctions on ENWP
> > Hello Pine,
> > You might want to record it in the IdeaLab to make sure that it
> considered
> > for future reference when people are discussing ideas for research.
> > Sydney
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM Pine W <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello colleagues,
> >>
> >> There is currently a small amount of discussion happening on an ENWP
> >> arbitration page
> >> <
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_Discretionary_sanctions
> >
> >> regarding what ENWP calls "discretionary sanctions
> >> <
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions
> >"
> >> practices. Does anyone know of research regarding the effects, good and
> >> bad, of the Arbcom authorization of discretionary sanctions? If not,
> then I
> >> suggest that this be a topic of future research, particularly for
> >> researchers involved with WMF's work on community health.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >>
> >> Pine
> >> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sydney Poore
> > Trust and Safety Specialist
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> > Trust and Safety team;
> > Anti-harassment tools team
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sydney Poore
> > Trust and Safety Specialist
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> > Trust and Safety team;
> > Anti-harassment tools team
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l