Global deleted image review (was [Commons-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Global deleted image review (was [Commons-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons)

David Gerard-2
2009/6/15 Huib Laurens <[hidden email]>:

> Here is the page on meta:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_deleted_image_review
> That one links to the vote that passed with 80% support.
> And for the bug:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14801


Looks like there's code to implement it, but it isn't very good ...

Is there an interested dev who could implement better code for this
bug? We appear to have the consensus, we just need good enough magical
incantations to implement it!


- d.

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Global deleted image review (was [Commons-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons)

K. Peachey
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:08 AM, David Gerard<[hidden email]> wrote:

> 2009/6/15 Huib Laurens <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Here is the page on meta:
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_deleted_image_review
>> That one links to the vote that passed with 80% support.
>> And for the bug:
>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14801
>
>
> Looks like there's code to implement it, but it isn't very good ...
>
> Is there an interested dev who could implement better code for this
> bug? We appear to have the consensus, we just need good enough magical
> incantations to implement it!
>
>
> - d.
If this is a gobal group why didn't i see any discussion about this
vote on other wikis (eg: en.wiki) before seeing this email?

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Global deleted image review (was [Commons-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons)

Robert Rohde
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:15 PM, K. Peachey<[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:08 AM, David Gerard<[hidden email]> wrote:
>> 2009/6/15 Huib Laurens <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Here is the page on meta:
>>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_deleted_image_review
>>> That one links to the vote that passed with 80% support.
>>> And for the bug:
>>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14801
>>
>>
>> Looks like there's code to implement it, but it isn't very good ...
>>
>> Is there an interested dev who could implement better code for this
>> bug? We appear to have the consensus, we just need good enough magical
>> incantations to implement it!
>>
>>
>> - d.
> If this is a gobal group why didn't i see any discussion about this
> vote on other wikis (eg: en.wiki) before seeing this email?

Cause you weren't paying attention?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive151#Global_deleted_image_review
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_49#Global_deleted_image_review
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2008-06-26/Global_groups
http://marc.info/?l=wikien-l&m=121417864110710&w=2
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Kurier/Ausgabe_5/6_2008
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Projektneuheiten/Archiv/2008-1#23._Juni

-Robert Rohde

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Global deleted image review (was [Commons-l] Some reflections about the governance of Commons)

Alex Zaddach
In reply to this post by K. Peachey
K. Peachey wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:08 AM, David Gerard<[hidden email]> wrote:
>> 2009/6/15 Huib Laurens <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Here is the page on meta:
>>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_deleted_image_review
>>> That one links to the vote that passed with 80% support.
>>> And for the bug:
>>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14801
>>
>> Looks like there's code to implement it, but it isn't very good ...
>>
>> Is there an interested dev who could implement better code for this
>> bug? We appear to have the consensus, we just need good enough magical
>> incantations to implement it!
>>
>>
>> - d.
> If this is a gobal group why didn't i see any discussion about this
> vote on other wikis (eg: en.wiki) before seeing this email?
>

The vote was a year ago. According to the discussion it was advertised
on at least 5 projects other than commons and meta - enwiki, nlwiki,
nowiki, dewiki, and enwikisource - as well as wikien-l and foundation-l.

--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l