New policy about performing research on English Wikipedia

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

New policy about performing research on English Wikipedia

Jonathan Morgan
Hi there wiki-research folks,

This is just a heads-up that English Wikipedia has adopted a new policy[1]
about research on that project. The policy codifies some new requirements
for community notification and disclosure that potentially apply to all
research projects (regardless of the affiliation of the researcher).

You can read more about the policy on WP:NOT[1], but I've included the
major points below for your convenience:

   - any research project that involves directly changing article content,
   surveying a large number of editors, or asking editors sensitive questions
   about their real-life identities needs to be discussed on Wikipedia's
   Village Pump[2] before it is begun[3]
   - researchers should disclose who they are on their user pages,
   including their institutional affiliation, sources of research funding (if
   applicable), and the intentions behind their research[4]

Many aspects of this policy boil down to either common sense, existing
ethical standards for human subjects research, or both. However, this
policy also leaves certain definitions and thresholds undefined. What is a
"large number" of surveyed users? What is a "sensitive question"?
There are no concrete answer to these questions yet, and that's probably a
good thing. The best way to keep this policy from becoming overly
restrictive[5] is for researchers to follow its guidance in good faith, and
ask questions when they're uncertain.

Projects that are deemed to be in violation of these guidelines may lose
editing privileges. If the violations are deemed particularly frequent or
severe, the EnWiki community may decide to make even more rules, which
could have a chilling effect on wikiresearch in general. Nobody wants
that.

If you have general questions about this policy or its application, the
best place to ask is the WP:NOT talkpage.[6]

If you have questions related to a specific planned research project, the
best thing to do is to err on the side of caution and open up a discussion
on the Village Pump before you begin.

You are also welcome to post your project plan to this list, where we, your
friendly peers, will hopefully offer constructive feedback and links to
relevant resources.

Wikimedia Foundation research staff are not in charge of these guidelines,
but are happy to offer advice "from the trenches" so to speak if asked. We
are on this list too.

As always, if you are currently researching Wikipedia, or plan to do so,
please create a Research Project page on MetaWiki[7] (example[8], tips[9]),
keep it up to date, and link to it from your userpage[10]. That way
interested parties can follow your research and ask questions, and you
won't need to constantly re-explain what you're doing every time someone
asks.

Happy researching,

Jonathan



   1.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_laboratory
   2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)
   3.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#cite_note-7
   4.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#cite_note-8
   5. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Instruction_creep
   6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not
   7. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Projects
   8.
   https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Supporting_Commons_contribution_by_GLAM_institutions
   9.
   https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Project_documentation_best_practices
   10. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:LZia_(WMF)




--
Jonathan T. Morgan
Senior Design Researcher
Wikimedia Foundation
User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New policy about performing research on English Wikipedia

Andy Mabbett-2
On 2 January 2018 at 23:29, Jonathan Morgan <[hidden email]> wrote:

> This is just a heads-up that English Wikipedia has adopted a new policy[1]
> about research on that project.

>    1.
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_laboratory

I have concerns, which I have raised in:

   https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWhat_Wikipedia_is_not&type=revision&diff=818416632&oldid=818340063

about the way this was introduced.

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New policy about performing research on English Wikipedia

Andy Mabbett-2
On 3 January 2018 at 12:17, Andy Mabbett <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 2 January 2018 at 23:29, Jonathan Morgan <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> This is just a heads-up that English Wikipedia has adopted a new policy[1]
>> about research on that project.

> I have concerns, which I have raised in:
>
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWhat_Wikipedia_is_not&type=revision&diff=818416632&oldid=818340063
>
> about the way this was introduced.

Others expressed similar concerns; as a result, the policy has been
withdrawn, and returned to "Requests for Comment" status.

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l