On 12 February 2012 17:34, Harry Burt <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I do wonder if there's a conflation here of publication and licensing.
> For example, it is not clear to me whether publishing personal information
> under a restrictive licence is less bad than publishing it under an open
> That is to say, I'm not sure that restrictive copyright is the right tool to
> use in each of the examples. Wouldn't it be better simply to not disclose
> the private information in the first place?
I've raised similar points on the talk page. Would you mind adding
your comments there? I think that's probably the better venue for this