Re : [Election] Mail to the unqualified votes whose vote will be struck

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re : [Election] Mail to the unqualified votes whose vote will be struck

louis bodo

I think it is right to be pedantic. In fact, if it is not stated already, it should be stated that this means any single WP project, but counts in several projects cannot be added together

Louis


 
Errare humanum, et in errore perseverare stultum est


----- Message d'origine ----
De : Jon Harald Søby <[hidden email]>
À : Wikimedia Translators <[hidden email]>
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 6 Juillet 2007, 12h55mn 17s
Objet : Re: [Translators-l] [Election] Mail to the unqualified votes whose vote will be struck

It should read June 1, not March 1. Flick the wording as you'd like. :-)

On 7/6/07, Michelle Gallaway <[hidden email]> wrote:
Don't want to be pedantic, but shouldn't that be "The election rules
state that users must have *had* at least 400 edits by March 1 to be
eligible to vote.", since the chances of anyone who does not meet
these criteria meeting them in the future is nil?

I know this is translators-l, not englishgrammarscrutiny-l, but we
might as well get it right in as many languages as possible.

_______________________________________________
Translators-l mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l



--
Jon Harald Søby
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
_______________________________________________
Translators-l mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l



Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
_______________________________________________
Translators-l mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l