Rupert, presentation sheets are at http://infodisiac.com/Wikimedia/2014%20London.pdf
From: Wiki-research-l <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of [hidden email]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2019 13:00
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 162, Issue 5
Send Wiki-research-l mailing list submissions to
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
You can reach the person managing the list at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Wiki-research-l digest..."
1. Re: [Wikimedia-l] Farewell, Erik! (rupert THURNER)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:21:27 +0100
From: rupert THURNER <[hidden email]>
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <[hidden email]>
Cc: "A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who
has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics."
<[hidden email]>, Research into Wikimedia content and
communities <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Wikimedia-l] Farewell, Erik!
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Many thanks erik and all the best!! One sentence in eriks blog post cited i found surprising. What type of modesty you guys were talking about?
"At Wikimania London (2014) I talked about how we should err on the side of modesty. That message never came across. I started to have a discussion on this within WMF but failed to bring this to fruition. My bad."
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019, 22:18 Dario Taraborelli <[hidden email]
> “[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older
> layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti
> applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful
> information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls
> of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a
> lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these
> raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
> Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post <
> ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he
> gave us. Erik retired
> <http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm> this past Friday,
> leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for
> several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
> His Wikistats project <https://stats.wikimedia.org/>—with his
> signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid
> been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual
> attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and
> make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history,
> driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the
> communities that most needed it.
> Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data
> describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across
> languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller
> communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics
> such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers,
> the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand
> some of the growing pains and editor retention issues <
> the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by
> nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to
> understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current
> events like elections <
> or public health crises
> He has created countless
> visualizations <
> that show the enormous gaps in local language content and
> representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an
> encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of
> pie charts <
> which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
> Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited
> 1,000 times
> in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators
> in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would
> be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think
> it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and
> metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth
> and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more
> broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
> Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable
> colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human
> being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
> Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement,
> read his statement <http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm>
> to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait
> <https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/> Wired published
> a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's
> Massive Data Trove".
> *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
> research.wikimedia.org • nitens.org • @readermeter
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> New messages to: [hidden email]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe>
Subject: Digest Footer
Wiki-research-l mailing list
End of Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 162, Issue 5
Wiki-research-l mailing list
|Free forum by Nabble||Edit this page|