Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Dario Taraborelli-3
Hi everybody,

with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1]

Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.

Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we’re experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list.

Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer

[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Klein,Max
Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the signpost in time. 25th?

Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023

________________________________________
From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for    review

Hi everybody,

with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1]

Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.

Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we’re experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list.

Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer

[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Tilman Bayer
Hi Max,

yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
reading your summary!

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the signpost in time. 25th?
>
> Maximilian Klein
> Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
> +17074787023
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
> To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities
> Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for    review
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1]
>
> Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>
> Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list.
>
> Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>
> [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Heather Ford-3
Thanks, Dario, Tilman! 

I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...

Best,
Heather.



On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Max,

yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
reading your summary!

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the signpost in time. 25th?
>
> Maximilian Klein
> Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
> <a href="tel:%2B17074787023" value="+17074787023">+17074787023
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
> To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities
> Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for    review
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1]
>
> Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>
> Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list.
>
> Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>
> [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Tilman Bayer
Hi Heather,

that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
>
> I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
> to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
> paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
> very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
> summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
> I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
> research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
> comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
>
> Best,
> Heather.
>
> Heather Ford
> Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
> EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
>
>
>
>
> On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Max,
>>
>> yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
>> is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
>> is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
>> take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
>> up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
>> reading your summary!
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
>> > signpost in time. 25th?
>> >
>> > Maximilian Klein
>> > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
>> > +17074787023
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: [hidden email]
>> > <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli
>> > <[hidden email]>
>> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
>> > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
>> > an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
>> > content and communities
>> > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
>> > for    review
>> >
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
>> > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
>> > Newsletter [1]
>> >
>> > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
>> > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
>> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>> >
>> > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
>> > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and
>> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
>> > free to get in touch off-list.
>> >
>> > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>> >
>> > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tilman Bayer
>> Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Klein,Max
Great idea Heather,

I will add my name to my review. Do you know any other review sites that aggregate in a wiki way that we could emulate?

Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
+17074787023

________________________________________
From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> on behalf of Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:16 AM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Hi Heather,

that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
>
> I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
> to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
> paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
> very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
> summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
> I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
> research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
> comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
>
> Best,
> Heather.
>
> Heather Ford
> Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
> EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
>
>
>
>
> On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Max,
>>
>> yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
>> is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
>> is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
>> take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
>> up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
>> reading your summary!
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
>> > signpost in time. 25th?
>> >
>> > Maximilian Klein
>> > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
>> > +17074787023
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: [hidden email]
>> > <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli
>> > <[hidden email]>
>> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
>> > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
>> > an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
>> > content and communities
>> > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
>> > for    review
>> >
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
>> > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
>> > Newsletter [1]
>> >
>> > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
>> > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
>> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>> >
>> > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
>> > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and
>> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
>> > free to get in touch off-list.
>> >
>> > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>> >
>> > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tilman Bayer
>> Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Juliana Bastos Marques
In reply to this post by Tilman Bayer
Do you publish on papers in languages other than English?

Juliana.


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Heather,

that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
>
> I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
> to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
> paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
> very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
> summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
> I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
> research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
> comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
>
> Best,
> Heather.
>
> Heather Ford
> Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
> EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
>
>
>
>
> On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Max,
>>
>> yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
>> is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
>> is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
>> take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
>> up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
>> reading your summary!
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
>> > signpost in time. 25th?
>> >
>> > Maximilian Klein
>> > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
>> > <a href="tel:%2B17074787023" value="+17074787023">+17074787023
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: [hidden email]
>> > <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli
>> > <[hidden email]>
>> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
>> > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
>> > an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
>> > content and communities
>> > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
>> > for    review
>> >
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
>> > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
>> > Newsletter [1]
>> >
>> > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
>> > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
>> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>> >
>> > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
>> > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and
>> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
>> > free to get in touch off-list.
>> >
>> > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>> >
>> > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tilman Bayer
>> Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



--
www.domusaurea.org

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Tilman Bayer
Hi Juliana,

yes, English-language summaries of papers in other languages are
welcome - in the draft for the current issue you can already see a
review of a German paper that discusses Wikipedia's linguistic norms
and style as a case study for the development of academic language,
and on the Etherpad todo list there's a Russian language paper that
claims to have discovered "unacceptable logic violations" in the
English Wikipedia's category graph.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Juliana Bastos Marques
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Do you publish on papers in languages other than English?
>
> Juliana.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Heather,
>>
>> that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
>> like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
>> displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
>> and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
>> histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
>> easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
>> many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
>> suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
>> let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
>> >
>> > I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer
>> > names/usernames
>> > to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
>> > paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting
>> > some
>> > very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
>> > summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily
>> > (although
>> > I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social
>> > science
>> > research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
>> > comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Heather.
>> >
>> > Heather Ford
>> > Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
>> > EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
>> > http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Max,
>> >>
>> >> yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
>> >> is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
>> >> is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
>> >> take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
>> >> up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
>> >> reading your summary!
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into
>> >> > the
>> >> > signpost in time. 25th?
>> >> >
>> >> > Maximilian Klein
>> >> > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
>> >> > +17074787023
>> >> >
>> >> > ________________________________________
>> >> > From: [hidden email]
>> >> > <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario
>> >> > Taraborelli
>> >> > <[hidden email]>
>> >> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
>> >> > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who
>> >> > has
>> >> > an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into
>> >> > Wikimedia
>> >> > content and communities
>> >> > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers
>> >> > open
>> >> > for    review
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi everybody,
>> >> >
>> >> > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up
>> >> > we
>> >> > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the
>> >> > Research
>> >> > Newsletter [1]
>> >> >
>> >> > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
>> >> > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As
>> >> > usual,
>> >> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>> >> >
>> >> > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
>> >> > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to
>> >> > analytics-l and
>> >> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process
>> >> > feel
>> >> > free to get in touch off-list.
>> >> >
>> >> > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> >> > [hidden email]
>> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> >> > [hidden email]
>> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Tilman Bayer
>> >> Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
>> >> Wikimedia Foundation
>> >> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> >> [hidden email]
>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tilman Bayer
>> Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.domusaurea.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Heather Ford-3
In reply to this post by Klein,Max
Hi Max :)

Thanks for adding your name to the review! Not quite sure I understand your question about other wiki sites that we could emulate? The research newsletter is pretty much single author per review so it's not really done in a 'wiki way' (e.g. by many authors producing a single review) other than using wiki software so I don't think anything is needed other than simply adding the byline next to the headline of the review as well as to at the top of the newsletter as per current practice. 

I'm thinking that these bylines wouldn't be needed for the snippets but rather for the more significant reviews. 

What do you think?

Or were you asking about other methods of actually producing the signpost?



On 25 February 2014 20:35, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:
Great idea Heather,

I will add my name to my review. Do you know any other review sites that aggregate in a wiki way that we could emulate?

Maximilian Klein
Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
<a href="tel:%2B17074787023" value="+17074787023">+17074787023

________________________________________
From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> on behalf of Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:16 AM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Hi Heather,

that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something
like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently
displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost
and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version
histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution
easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with
many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a
suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue,
let's follow up offlist if more information is needed.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks, Dario, Tilman!
>
> I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames
> to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a
> paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some
> very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular
> summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although
> I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science
> research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these
> comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think...
>
> Best,
> Heather.
>
> Heather Ford
> Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
> EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group
> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa
>
>
>
>
> On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Max,
>>
>> yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline
>> is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date
>> is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might
>> take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing
>> up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to
>> reading your summary!
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the
>> > signpost in time. 25th?
>> >
>> > Maximilian Klein
>> > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC
>> > <a href="tel:%2B17074787023" value="+17074787023">+17074787023
>> >
>> > ________________________________________
>> > From: [hidden email]
>> > <[hidden email]> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli
>> > <[hidden email]>
>> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM
>> > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
>> > an       interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia
>> > content and communities
>> > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open
>> > for    review
>> >
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we
>> > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research
>> > Newsletter [1]
>> >
>> > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and
>> > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual,
>> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.
>> >
>> > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're
>> > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and
>> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel
>> > free to get in touch off-list.
>> >
>> > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer
>> >
>> > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tilman Bayer
>> Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications)
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l