[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Input on new models

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Input on new models

metasj
Forwarding on behalf of Bence.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bence Damokos <[hidden email]>
Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Subject: [Movementroles] Input on new models

Hi all,

Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the
procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new
types of affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely
depend on the requirements and definition we use.

I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages
I have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the
conclusions of this group] and provide feedback (which could range
from "seems good" to suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim
is not to restart any debates that we have already concluded, rather
to make sure that the documents created reflect the final consensus
and nothing is left out and nothing controversial is added.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organizations (if
anyone can create a new map that shows the Amical regions, that would
be appreciated, as well)
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_thematic_organization_creation_guide
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_thematic_organizations
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_user_group_creation_guide
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_user_groups


Thank you,
Best,
Bence

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[hidden email]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Input on new models

Dominic McDevitt-Parks
The Board's resolution for the new Affiliations Committee says that "The
proposed charter and plan should be submitted to the Board by 15 June, for
approval by its July 2012 meeting." Did that ever happen? I'm glad that
Wikimedia CAT has been able to start the thematic organization application,
and that there is a preliminary process in place for that and the user
groups (along with the pre-existing chapter process), but what about
movement partners?

Dominic

On 21 June 2012 11:06, Samuel Klein <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Forwarding on behalf of Bence.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bence Damokos <[hidden email]>
> Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
> Subject: [Movementroles] Input on new models
>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the
> procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new
> types of affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely
> depend on the requirements and definition we use.
>
> I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages
> I have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the
> conclusions of this group] and provide feedback (which could range
> from "seems good" to suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim
> is not to restart any debates that we have already concluded, rather
> to make sure that the documents created reflect the final consensus
> and nothing is left out and nothing controversial is added.
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organizations (if
> anyone can create a new map that shows the Amical regions, that would
> be appreciated, as well)
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_thematic_organization_creation_guide
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_thematic_organizations
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_user_group_creation_guide
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_user_groups
>
>
> Thank you,
> Best,
> Bence
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[hidden email]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Input on new models

Samuel Klein-4
Hello Dominic,

A draft of the AffCom charter and plan have been shared with the
Board; I believe a final draft will be shared (and then published?)
within the week.  It is on the agenda for the Board's July meeting.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Board_meetings/July_11,_2012

AffCom is not taking on recognition of partners, at least initially
(as indicated in the same resolution you quote).  Right now the
Foundation and Chapters have separate processes for forming
partnerships and recognizing those partners.  It was suggested that a
WMF staff member oversee the process for recognizing partners, but
that remains to be finalized and aligned with existing process.

SJ

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> The Board's resolution for the new Affiliations Committee says that "The
> proposed charter and plan should be submitted to the Board by 15 June, for
> approval by its July 2012 meeting." Did that ever happen? I'm glad that
> Wikimedia CAT has been able to start the thematic organization application,
> and that there is a preliminary process in place for that and the user
> groups (along with the pre-existing chapter process), but what about
> movement partners?
>
> Dominic
>
> On 21 June 2012 11:06, Samuel Klein <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Forwarding on behalf of Bence.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Bence Damokos <[hidden email]>
>> Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
>> Subject: [Movementroles] Input on new models
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the
>> procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new
>> types of affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely
>> depend on the requirements and definition we use.
>>
>> I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages
>> I have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the
>> conclusions of this group] and provide feedback (which could range
>> from "seems good" to suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim
>> is not to restart any debates that we have already concluded, rather
>> to make sure that the documents created reflect the final consensus
>> and nothing is left out and nothing controversial is added.
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organizations (if
>> anyone can create a new map that shows the Amical regions, that would
>> be appreciated, as well)
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_thematic_organization_creation_guide
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_thematic_organizations
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_user_group_creation_guide
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_user_groups
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Best,
>> Bence
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l



--
Samuel Klein          identi.ca:sj           w:user:sj          +1 617 529 4266

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[hidden email]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Input on new models

Dominic McDevitt-Parks
Thanks for that information. The resolution doesn't actually spell out that
AffCom is not working on the partnerships, except implicitly by failing to
mention movement partners along with the other three (which I hadn't even
realized on first reading). Will the movement roles discussion at the Board
meeting be resolving the partnership process too, or is it mostly just
about AffCom?

Dominic

On 27 June 2012 14:15, Samuel Klein <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello Dominic,
>
> A draft of the AffCom charter and plan have been shared with the
> Board; I believe a final draft will be shared (and then published?)
> within the week.  It is on the agenda for the Board's July meeting.
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Board_meetings/July_11,_2012
>
> AffCom is not taking on recognition of partners, at least initially
> (as indicated in the same resolution you quote).  Right now the
> Foundation and Chapters have separate processes for forming
> partnerships and recognizing those partners.  It was suggested that a
> WMF staff member oversee the process for recognizing partners, but
> that remains to be finalized and aligned with existing process.
>
> SJ
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > The Board's resolution for the new Affiliations Committee says that "The
> > proposed charter and plan should be submitted to the Board by 15 June,
> for
> > approval by its July 2012 meeting." Did that ever happen? I'm glad that
> > Wikimedia CAT has been able to start the thematic organization
> application,
> > and that there is a preliminary process in place for that and the user
> > groups (along with the pre-existing chapter process), but what about
> > movement partners?
> >
> > Dominic
> >
> > On 21 June 2012 11:06, Samuel Klein <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Forwarding on behalf of Bence.
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Bence Damokos <[hidden email]>
> >> Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
> >> Subject: [Movementroles] Input on new models
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the
> >> procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new
> >> types of affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely
> >> depend on the requirements and definition we use.
> >>
> >> I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages
> >> I have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the
> >> conclusions of this group] and provide feedback (which could range
> >> from "seems good" to suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim
> >> is not to restart any debates that we have already concluded, rather
> >> to make sure that the documents created reflect the final consensus
> >> and nothing is left out and nothing controversial is added.
> >>
> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organizations (if
> >> anyone can create a new map that shows the Amical regions, that would
> >> be appreciated, as well)
> >>
> >>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_thematic_organization_creation_guide
> >>
> >>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_thematic_organizations
> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups
> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_user_group_creation_guide
> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_user_groups
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Best,
> >> Bence
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
>
>
> --
> Samuel Klein          identi.ca:sj           w:user:sj          +1 617
> 529 4266
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[hidden email]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Input on new models

Samuel Klein-4
Dominic - A fair point; this shoudl be clarified explicitly in the
description of AffCom work.  The discussion in DC will touch on both,
but is mostly about getting AffCom underway.   SJ

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Thanks for that information. The resolution doesn't actually spell out that
> AffCom is not working on the partnerships, except implicitly by failing to
> mention movement partners along with the other three (which I hadn't even
> realized on first reading). Will the movement roles discussion at the Board
> meeting be resolving the partnership process too, or is it mostly just
> about AffCom?
>
> Dominic
>
> On 27 June 2012 14:15, Samuel Klein <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Dominic,
>>
>> A draft of the AffCom charter and plan have been shared with the
>> Board; I believe a final draft will be shared (and then published?)
>> within the week.  It is on the agenda for the Board's July meeting.
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Board_meetings/July_11,_2012
>>
>> AffCom is not taking on recognition of partners, at least initially
>> (as indicated in the same resolution you quote).  Right now the
>> Foundation and Chapters have separate processes for forming
>> partnerships and recognizing those partners.  It was suggested that a
>> WMF staff member oversee the process for recognizing partners, but
>> that remains to be finalized and aligned with existing process.
>>
>> SJ
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > The Board's resolution for the new Affiliations Committee says that "The
>> > proposed charter and plan should be submitted to the Board by 15 June,
>> for
>> > approval by its July 2012 meeting." Did that ever happen? I'm glad that
>> > Wikimedia CAT has been able to start the thematic organization
>> application,
>> > and that there is a preliminary process in place for that and the user
>> > groups (along with the pre-existing chapter process), but what about
>> > movement partners?
>> >
>> > Dominic
>> >
>> > On 21 June 2012 11:06, Samuel Klein <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Forwarding on behalf of Bence.
>> >>
>> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> From: Bence Damokos <[hidden email]>
>> >> Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
>> >> Subject: [Movementroles] Input on new models
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the
>> >> procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new
>> >> types of affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely
>> >> depend on the requirements and definition we use.
>> >>
>> >> I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages
>> >> I have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the
>> >> conclusions of this group] and provide feedback (which could range
>> >> from "seems good" to suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim
>> >> is not to restart any debates that we have already concluded, rather
>> >> to make sure that the documents created reflect the final consensus
>> >> and nothing is left out and nothing controversial is added.
>> >>
>> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organizations (if
>> >> anyone can create a new map that shows the Amical regions, that would
>> >> be appreciated, as well)
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_thematic_organization_creation_guide
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_thematic_organizations
>> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups
>> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_user_group_creation_guide
>> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_user_groups
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thank you,
>> >> Best,
>> >> Bence
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> >> [hidden email]
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Samuel Klein          identi.ca:sj           w:user:sj          +1 617
>> 529 4266
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l



--
Samuel Klein          identi.ca:sj           w:user:sj          +1 617 529 4266

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[hidden email]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l