[Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
21 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopaedia

Rich Farmbrough
Rui (and list) there is a myth about "articles that are sacrosanct" -
which is not to say that there aren't such articles, though the examples
you gave don't stand up to much scrutiny.  It would be useful to conduct
some research on the whole corpus to evaluate this hypothesis and give
some upper and lower bounds for  the populaiton, and to establish some
sample lists for qualitative examination.

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[hidden email]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe>
12