allow tinyurl.com

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

allow tinyurl.com

Sterling D. Allan
The spam protection filter kicked in today because one of the urls was "tinyurl.com"

I don't want that blocked.  It is a very helpful too for shortening long URLs.

How do I disable that block?

http://PESWiki.com
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[hidden email]
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: allow tinyurl.com

Rob Church
Go and talk about it on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist.


Rob Church

On 03/02/06, Sterling D. Allan <[hidden email]> wrote:

> The spam protection filter kicked in today because one of the urls was "tinyurl.com"
>
> I don't want that blocked.  It is a very helpful too for shortening long URLs.
>
> How do I disable that block?
>
> http://PESWiki.com
> _______________________________________________
> MediaWiki-l mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
>
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[hidden email]
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: allow tinyurl.com

Gordon Mohr (@ Bitzi)
In reply to this post by Sterling D. Allan
Sterling D. Allan wrote:
> The spam protection filter kicked in today because one of the urls was "tinyurl.com"
>
> I don't want that blocked.  It is a very helpful too for shortening long URLs.
>
> How do I disable that block?

Perhaps you are using the SpamBlacklist extension, and tinyurl is on
one of the blacklists it is configured to consult? These docs could
help:

  http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/SpamBlacklist_Documentation

I personally think TinyURLs are awful for usability/stability/safety,
in wiki/email/anywere, because TinyURLs...

  (1) are opaque, hiding their ultimate destination from users.
  (2) send people unaware to any untrustworthy site, including
      transient sites designed to exploit browser vulnerability
      to install malware. So if allowed, they make a gaping hole
      in any blacklist.
  (3) introduce a dependency on a third-party service that could
      go away or be completely compromised in the future. Not
      only could that one TinyURL you see today go to a porn spam
      site, but someday in the future, EVERY TinyURL could be
      retroactively changed to go to a porn spam site.

- Gordon

_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[hidden email]
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l