> Maru Dubshinki wrote:
> > Is that really their reason? That is *remarkably stupid* of them. I
> > had thought there was a real reason; such lame excuses disgust me.
> The real situation is that our current blocking system sucks. A lot. And if we
> just "flipped a switch" it would suck *MUCH WORSE* because it would be virtually
> impossible to actually block anyone -- just create a bunch of accounts and
> you're immune until someone laboriously tracks them all down.
> So, it'll take more options and rethinking and generally some better, clearer
> idea of what blocking's supposed to do.
> -- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
I disagree- this move would add granularity to our blocking system. If
we still had problems with sleeper accounts, well, I laboriously
explained above that that would *still* be an improvement over the