I am a teacher so tend to rely on refereed journals as reliable
sources...tho science writer *J**onah Lehrer* even calls these into
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Morton <[hidden email] > wrote:
> Depends on the explanation I suppose. But "reliable source" is jargon
> too, in many cases.
> We do have difficulty communicating with non wikipedians. Not in a bad
> faith way; it is hard to communicate with others.
> I just think we are too quick to blame the subject for "not
> understanding us". When it cuts deeply both ways.
> Tom Morton
> On 8 Sep 2012, at 16:29, Charles Matthews
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On 8 September 2012 15:43, Thomas Morton <[hidden email] > >wrote:
> >> Wow high and mighty much?
> >> I haven't had chance to look into this; but I bet I know what I will
> >> find. Someone being a bit of a jerk to him, which has led to having to
> >> take this approach.
> > You might be justified in saying this if he was really told he wasn't
> > "credible". If he was told that he wasn't a "reliable source" in WP's
> > terms, that is a different kettle of fish.
> > Charles
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > [hidden email] > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> [hidden email] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >